The Friese-Greene Club

The Friese-Greene Club The Friese-Greene Club is a small, private member's club in Bangkok Thailand. Visitors Welcome
(214)

It is dedicated to those people who have a passion for cinema; filmmakers, film students, film journalists, or film enthusiasts.

07/10/2025
October at the Friese-Greene ClubTo start on a cheery, upbeat note:Cinema is dying.Not dramatically, like Bonnie and Cly...
07/10/2025

October at the Friese-Greene Club

To start on a cheery, upbeat note:
Cinema is dying.

Not dramatically, like Bonnie and Clyde shredded by 130 rounds in 45 seconds of violent cinema. More like Roy Batty drifting peacefully away, reminiscing about C-beams glittering in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate—a quiet drift into inevitable sleep.

"But Barbie made a billion dollars!" Yes, and people kept ordering champagne on the Titanic even as the bow dipped below the waterline.

Here are some numbers, because numbers (unlike studio accountants, Independent Producers and all sales agents) don't lie.

In 2019: 7.3 billion cinema tickets sold globally.

In 2024: 4.8 billion.

That's 68% of pre-pandemic levels. And here's the killer: 2024 was the first year since COVID that attendance actually *declined*—from 5.3 billion in 2023 down to 4.8 billion. We're not recovering. The European Audiovisual Observatory says we've reached a "new plateau"—diplomatic speak for "this is as good as it gets."

But what if we look further back?

North America 2024: 760 million tickets.

North America 1946: 4.68 billion tickets.

In 1946, the population was 141 million—people went to the cinema 35 times per year. Today, with 340 million people, we buy 760 million tickets. That's under 2 per person annually. If Americans went to the cinema at 1946 rates today, we'd sell 12 billion tickets. We're at 6% of that.

"But television killed cinema in the 1950s and it survived!" Yes, television murdered cinema—weekly attendance collapsed 56% as TV ownership exploded from zero to 90% of households. Cinema fought back with CinemaScope, 3D, drive-ins, and blockbusters. It worked. Sort of. Cinema stabilized at one-third of peak attendance.

But that was when home screens were 12-inch black-and-white tellies with three channels showing documentaries about cheese. Today you've got a 65-inch 4K television, Netflix, Disney+, Amazon Prime, and seventeen other services. Every film ever made at the touch of a button. Pause for the loo. Eat your own food. Sit in your pants.

The cinema charges £15 to sit next to a teenager on their phone, eating £8 popcorn, to watch a film that'll be on Disney+ in 30 days.

Let's talk about where the money actually is.

Global cinema box office 2024: $33 billion.

Gaming industry 2024: $224 billion.

Gaming is seven times larger than the entire global cinema industry.

Netflix revenue 2024: $39 billion.

One company—just Netflix—makes more than the entire global cinema box office.

Streaming subscriptions overall: $233 billion. YouTube advertising alone: $36 billion—more than global box office.

The six biggest media companies spent $126 billion on content in 2024, creating thousands of hours that go straight to streaming. In 2004, there were 200 scripted TV series in America. In 2024: over 500.

Gen Z spends 82 minutes per day streaming (500 hours yearly), 58 minutes on TikTok, 49 minutes on YouTube. How much time in cinemas? Maybe 36 hours per year if they're frequent moviegoers—which only 3% are.

52% of Gen Z prefer streaming at home. Only 3% go to cinemas weekly. Only 14% monthly. The theatrical window collapsed from 90 days to 30 days. Why pay £15 when you can watch it at home in a month?

The actual cinemas are bankrupt. AMC Theatres: $4.5 billion in debt, technically insolvent, share price down 93%. Cineworld/Regal filed bankruptcy with $4.8 billion in debt. ArcLight permanently closed. North America lost 5,000 screens between 2019 and 2024.

Ticket prices are up 15-20% to $11.31. Despite charging more, total revenue is 23% below 2019 because nobody's coming.

The habit is broken. In 2019, 11% of Americans were frequent moviegoers (at least once monthly). In 2024: 6%. Half of them just stopped. Average visits dropped from 3.5 per year to under 2. A third of the population never goes anymore.

Once you realize watching at home is genuinely brilliant—curled up on your IKEA Flörgenbörg sofa with the throw pillows positioned just so—it's very hard to build the cinema habit back.

You don't really get a sense of this cinematic calamity when you're on the red carpet. Cannes had a record 35,000 attendees. These are industry events—people whose job is cinema. Meanwhile, actual cinemas where ordinary people go are closing by the hundreds. The people whose livelihood depends on cinema keep insisting it's irreplaceable, then wonder why multiplexes are empty.

Cinema hasn't disappeared. People still go to the theatre, buy vinyl, read physical books. But cinema transformed from a mass medium into a niche activity for special occasions.

Your grandmother went twice a month. Your parents once a month. You go a few times a year. Your kids will go once or twice, if that.

"If cinema is dying, why are we watching films at the Friese-Greene Club?" Because we're the weirdos. The vinyl collectors in an age of Spotify. Let's not pretend we represent cinema's future. We represent its past—and if we're lucky, a very small niche corner of its future.

Most people have made their choice. Sofa over cinema seat. Streaming over screenings. Convenience over community. And I can't really blame them.

But we'll keep showing films here. Because watching a film projected on a screen, in the dark, with a few other humans, remains fundamentally different and often better than watching it on your laptop while checking your phone every ten minutes.

Even if the rest of the world has decided they'd rather do exactly that.

Have a great month at the Friese-Greene Club.

Book your seats at:
http://fgc.in.th

'Dream!' the film made by Paul and Nuy, the proprietors of the Friese-Greene Club (as well as some of the long-establish...
04/10/2025

'Dream!' the film made by Paul and Nuy, the proprietors of the Friese-Greene Club (as well as some of the long-established members like David, Rob, and Jonathan) will be showing tonight as part of the Bangkok International Film Festival.
https://www.majorcineplex.com/.../search_showtime/movie=3039
Seats may be sold out already for the 4th.
If so, use the same link, but click on the 9th, when there will be a repeat screening.
Look forward to seeing some of our members there!

TonightWith Khun David telling the behind-the-scenes story.
02/10/2025

Tonight
With Khun David telling the behind-the-scenes story.

18/09/2025
Cinema Oasis is a great venue, and very original programming.Check it out!
04/09/2025

Cinema Oasis is a great venue, and very original programming.

Check it out!

📣 คุยกับผู้กำกับ :
คุยกับผู้กำกับภาพยนตร์ที่ผ่านการคัดเลือกรางวัล ชมรมวิจารณ์บันเทิง
ประเภท "ภาพยนตร์ไทยแห่งปี" ประจำปี 2567
🎬 พสธร วัชรพาณิชย์, ผู้กำกับ 'มันดาลา'
🎬 อชิตพนธิ์ เพียรสุขประเสริฐ, ผู้กำกับ 'ฝนเลือด'
วันอาทิตย์ที่ 7 กันยายนนี้!!!
⏰ 16.00 น. (15.30 - ปาร์ตี้น้ำชา)
(ก่อนกิจกรรมดังกล่าว)
ภาพยนตร์ทั้ง 2 เรื่องกลับมาฉายอีกครั้งที่ Cinema Oasis ในวันเดียวกัน :
12.15 - BloodRain (ฝนเลือด)
14.00 - Mandala: Rivulet of Universe (มันดาลา)
แล้วพบกัน!!!
---------------
📣 Directors TALK :
with Shortlist for ‘Outstanding Thai Features’
by The Bangkok Critics Assembly Award 2024
🎬 Possathorn Watcharapanit ,director of 'Mandala: Rivulet of Universe'
🎬 Achitaphon Piansukprasert ,director of 'Blood Rain'
This Sunday, September 7!!!
⏰ 16:00 (15:30 – Tea Party)
(Before the event start)
Both films return to the screen at Cinema Oasis on the same day!
12.15 - BloodRain (ฝนเลือด)
14.00 - Mandala: Rivulet of Universe (มันดาลา)
See You There!!!
---------------

#ชมรมวิจารณ์บันเทิง

The Friese-Greene Club Schedule - September 2025The chase has lasted twelve blocks. Through alleyways, over chain-link f...
03/09/2025

The Friese-Greene Club Schedule - September 2025

The chase has lasted twelve blocks. Through alleyways, over chain-link fences, across rooftops. Kowalski's lungs burn as he pounds up the warehouse stairs, the sound of heavy police boots thundering behind him.
"End of the line, Kowalski!" Detective Morrison shouts from below. The same Detective Morrison who's been taking bribes from the Torrino family for years. The same Morrison who planted evidence on Kowalski's partner. The same Morrison who absolutely cannot let him reach the FBI with that USB drive.
Kowalski slams through a door at the end of the corridor. A storage room. No other exits. No windows. The walls are solid concrete.
He's trapped.
Just seconds later, Morrison kicks the door open, weapon raised. The room is empty. Four bare walls, a concrete floor. No possible escape route.
"What the hell?" Morrison spins in a circle, checking every corner. Nothing. The room is maybe ten by ten feet. A rat couldn't hide in here.
He lowers his weapon, shaking his head. "Impossible," he mutters, backing out of the room. "Where did he..."
The camera slowly tilts upward.
There, wedged between two ceiling beams like a gymnast frozen mid-routine, Kowalski clings to the shadows above. A bead of sweat forms on his forehead. His arms shake from the strain. He watches Morrison leave, waits for the footsteps to fade, then drops silently to the floor.

This got me thinking about the peculiar contract we have with movie tropes. We've all seen the ceiling cling so many times that if we found ourselves in that warehouse, our first instinct would be to check the ceiling. TV Tropes even has a name for it—the "Ceiling Cling," where "a character avoids pursuit or detection by hanging from the ceiling of the room or hallway."

But here's the thing: movie characters don't know they're in a movie.

Not only that, they apparently have never seen any one of the hundreds of films and TV episodes featuring the ceiling cling. Apparently movie characters exist in a universe where no one has ever watched a film.

Think about it. If you were being chased by a killer and your car wouldn't start, you'd immediately think, "Oh Christ, I'm in a horror movie cliché." But movie characters? They just keep turning that key, pumping the gas pedal like it's going to magically fix a problem that's clearly more supernatural than mechanical.

If you heard a strange noise in your basement, your first thought would be, "Absolutely not. I've seen this film. I'm calling the police and moving to a well-lit apartment complex." But movie characters? Down they go, usually carrying a flickering candle instead of, you know, a proper torch or their phone's flashlight.

So why do we accept this? Why don't we throw our popcorn at the screen in disgust when the eighth character this week fails to look up?

Well, perhaps one reason we accept that characters don't look up is because if they did, the story would be over in five minutes.

"Right, checked the ceiling, found that annoying rogue cop who was messing up our plans, shot him. Anyone fancy a pint?"

Not exactly edge-of-your-seat stuff.

Here's the truly bonkers part: even though we know exactly what's going to happen, we still enjoy it. We still feel that little thrill when the villain drops from above, even though we saw it coming from the moment the hero entered the room.

As Carl Jung believed, there exists a "collective unconscious," an inherited set of memories and ideas shared across humanity. Tropes tap into this shared understanding. We know the monster is behind the door. We know the call is coming from inside the house. We know the seemingly dead villain will grab the hero's ankle one last time.

And yet, it still works.

There seems to be an entire constitution of things movie characters are contractually obligated not to know:

Article 1: If you defeat the villain, you must immediately drop your weapon and turn your back on their "dead" body. No double-tap. No checking for a pulse. Just assume they're done and start hugging survivors.

Article 2: All air ducts are spotlessly clean, perfectly human-sized, and structurally sound enough to support a full-grown adult crawling through them at speed.

Article 3: If you're a cop one day from retirement, you must announce this fact repeatedly, thereby guaranteeing your immediate death.

Article 4: If you knock someone unconscious, they'll stay out for exactly as long as the plot requires—anywhere from 30 seconds to 3 hours—with no brain damage.

Article 5: If you're in a horror film and find an old newspaper clipping, it will explain the entire backstory and be conveniently headlined "MURDER HOUSE CLAIMS 17TH VICTIM."

Article 6: If someone living a peaceful life is approached with a dangerous mission and declares "No way. Not gonna happen. There is no way I'm getting on that plane," the next scene will absolutely be them on that plane, looking resigned.

Article 7: If two strangers—a man and a woman—bump into each other, argue over a queue, or fight over a parking space, they will end up getting married. The more heated the initial confrontation, the more passionate the eventual wedding.

Article 8: After trash-talking someone, you must say "He's right behind me, isn't he?" The person will indeed be standing directly behind you, having materialized silently like a ninja with hurt feelings.

Article 9: When walking away from explosions, you must never look back or flinch. The fireball may singe your jacket dramatically, but your hair will remain perfectly styled.

Article 10: When faced with any danger as a group, someone must suggest "Let's split up!" This guarantees maximum vulnerability and ensures at least half of you will die horribly alone.

Article 11: Grainy surveillance footage can always be enhanced by shouting "Enhance!" at a computer. Pixels will magically reorganize themselves to reveal crystal-clear images, license plates, and probably what the suspect had for breakfast.

Article 12: If you have to raise a barn, prepare for a battle, create a new fashion line, or accomplish any impossible task in a ridiculously short time, simply use a music-driven montage. No matter how impossible the task, by the time the music ends, it will be complete.

If everyone in horror films acted sensibly—called the police immediately, stayed in groups, checked ceilings, left haunted houses—we'd have no stories. Just a series of competent people making reasonable decisions and living to see the credits.

But here's what's truly fascinating: there's a strict intelligence hierarchy in films, and it determines who lives and who dies.

The people who don't check the ceiling? They're going to be chewed out by the police chief for their incompetence, suspended without pay, and probably end up as shopping mall security. The ones who go down to investigate the basement? Toast. Stupid people die—that's movie law. Unless, of course, they're women.

You see, women in movies operate under different rules. They're portrayed as much sweeter, more naive and trusting, so they can get away with doing stupid things and sometimes survive. After all, movies seem to think women don't really understand complex things like cars, and can't be expected to do so. They'll flood the engine when trying to start the car, bless their pretty heads, and we still want them to escape because... well... they're pretty, and that's definitely in their favour.

But heroes? Heroes must win through superiority. They're better at everything: dodging bullets that would shred a normal person, hitting targets without aiming, spotting snipers on rooftops with just a peripheral glance. They can pick locks with a paperclip in three seconds, speak seventeen languages fluently, and somehow know exactly which wire to cut on a bomb despite never attending a single EOD course.

Heroes can fight off ten attackers simultaneously while making quips. They can drive any vehicle—car, motorcycle, helicopter, alien spacecraft—with expert precision despite no apparent training. They'll notice the one clue everyone else missed: a single strand of hair, a faint scent of almonds indicating cyanide, or the way someone's eyes flicker left when lying.

The interesting paradox is that we also love underdogs. So films often give us heroes whose abilities are constantly underestimated. Take 'Slow Horses'—it follows a group of washed-up, loser British secret agents relegated to the B-squad. Yet when the elite fighting 'dogs' come to kill them, these supposed failures turn out to be smarter strategists, better marksmen, and stronger fighters than their elite counterparts.

Every single bloody week, Quincy had a suspicion that something was wrong with the investigation, and his superior never ever supported him—always shouted at him for his reckless stubbornness, even though every week for countless seasons, Quincy was always right.

The best heroes are the ones only we, the audience, truly recognize. Everyone else in their world treats them like idiots. "Okay, you may have just saved the world from nuclear annihilation, but some of the grease from the detonator splashed on the Mayor's coat, and he's mad as hell. Better get back to your basement office and think about what you've done." The hero shrugs, we rage at the injustice, and next week they'll save everyone again while being yelled at for using the wrong pen to fill out the report.

Even James Bond—arguably cinema's most celebrated hero—spent half his screen time being lectured by M for his recklessness, berated by Q for destroying expensive gadgets, and generally treated as a liability by his own organization despite saving the world approximately twice a year.

This creates a perfect intelligence hierarchy: villains and disposable characters are stupid enough to not check ceilings. We, the audience, are smart enough to know they should look up. But the hero? The hero is operating on another level entirely—they'd not only check the ceiling but probably anticipated the ceiling cling three moves ago and already set a trap.

Every now and then, the hero does something that impresses even us—some brilliant deduction or impossible feat that we didn't see coming. That's when we know we're watching someone truly special. Someone who deserves to survive not through luck or looks, but through sheer superiority.

The ceiling cling works not because we're stupid, but because we're complicit. This taps into what psychologists call our need for "cognitive framing"—we process the story through patterns we recognize, and part of the pleasure is recognizing those patterns.

Every time we watch a film, we agree to forget everything we know about films. The characters agree to act like they've never seen one. It's a beautiful, necessary delusion.

Because the alternative—genre-aware characters who check ceilings and never split up—gives us "Scream" or "Cabin in the Woods." Brilliant films, but they only work because they're exceptions. If every movie became self-aware, we'd lose the innocent pleasure of yelling at oblivious characters.

So here's to movie characters who never look up. Your willful blindness to overhead threats is what keeps cinema's heart beating. Without you, we'd have nowhere for our heroes to hide, no reason to feel superior, and no excuse to spill our popcorn in gleeful frustration.

Just remember: in real life, nobody ever hides on the ceiling.

Which is exactly what someone hiding on the ceiling would want you to think.

---

Have a great month at the Friese-Greene Club, where we promise all our heroes hide at eye level like civilized people.

14/08/2025
August at the Friese-Greene ClubDo you remember the good old days, when you’d spend three hours trying to generate an AI...
05/08/2025

August at the Friese-Greene Club

Do you remember the good old days, when you’d spend three hours trying to generate an AI image of Werner Herzog eating dim sum in the style of Salvador Dalí? The melting dumplings were perfect, the existential despair palpable, but Werner had sprouted eight fingers on his left hand and what appeared to be a third nostril. The restaurant sign behind him read "РЕСΤΑURΑΝΤ ŦĦĪПĢ"

Oh, how we wrestled with those early AI image generators! Extra limbs sprouting like mushrooms after rain, text that looked like it had been written by someone having a stroke in three languages simultaneously.

And that was last year!
Now? Now Werner has the correct number of fingers, the dim sum looks edible, and the text almost makes sense. We've gone from "hilarious abomination" to "mildly unsettling but technically proficient" in the time it takes to make a Marvel film.
Which brings me to my point: In a very short amount of time, AI has simultaneously become everything I've ever dreamed of and everything that keeps me awake at night. It's like being given a genie that grants unlimited wishes but occasionally interprets "I'd like a coffee" as "transform all liquid on Earth into espresso."

Growing up, I watched in awe as Captain Kirk spoke to the Enterprise computer: "Computer, analysis."
HAL 9000 sang "Daisy Bell" while being lobotomized. KITT helped Michael Knight fight crime while maintaining the dry wit of a British butler. The ship's computer in "Dark Star" had an existential crisis about phenomenology. Mother in "Alien" kept secrets that would get everyone killed. WOPR from "WarGames" nearly started World War III playing tic-tac-toe.
But here's the thing—all these fictional computers were tools to aid the human brain, not replace it. They were the ultimate assistants, the perfect sidekicks, the ideal companions for lonely space travelers or crime fighters with questionable fashion sense. Nobody suggested that KITT should write the scripts for Knight Rider (though given some of those episodes, maybe they should have).
Now we have actual AI, and it's everything those films promised and more. It's like all my dreams come true, (maybe after eating a little too much cheese).

Let me paint you a picture—or rather, let me type a sentence and have AI paint it for me.
I, a person whose artistic ability does not extend even slightly beyond the stick figure stage of human portraiture, can now create masterpieces. You want a banana windsurfing in the style of Caravaggio after smoking too much dope? Thirty seconds later, you've got it, complete with dramatic chiaroscuro lighting and a banana that looks wonderfully enlightened.
You want to see Elizabeth I as a zombie? Donald Trump drowning in a pool of shark-infested custard? A cross-section of the human brain revealing it's actually driven by tiny genius cockroaches playing chess?
Done, done, and disturbingly done.
Now, of course, anyone who has trained at art, or who is good at art, or heaven forbid, someone who might earn their living through art, will find this horrific. "It's not really art!" they cry. "How can it be art? It's made by a computer! Just because you typed something into a computer doesn't make you an artist!"
And that's quite right.
I am not an artist. I am a person with a keyboard and questionable impulse control.
But that doesn't remove one iota of joy from seeing my demented visions spring to life. It's democratic lunacy—everyone can now turn their wildest ideas into an image..

And it's not just images. Oh no, the written word has been democratized too.
Want a Chaucerian advertisement for Snickers bars? Here you go:

"But lo! Ther cam a barre of grete socour: SNIKERES! Of nougat and nuttes savour, Wyth peanutes grete and caramel sweete— Oon byte, and he was hymself compleet! Whan hungre maketh thee nat thyself to be, SNIKERES shal thy propre wit set free!"

How about Hamlet as a rap battle?

"Yo, yo, yo, STRAIGHT OUTTA ELSINORE, uh, yeah, SKRRT SKRRT, Hamlet in the castle with the chopper, BRRAP BRRAP, Uncle Claudius a whole-ass bitch, straight capped his pops with that ear-juice, DRIP DRIP, Now he pipin' down moms, got the crown, that's sus, NO CAP..."

Or perhaps John Betjeman's ode to Pattaya?

"I see the beauty in your concrete towers,
Your beach umbrellas ranked in tidy rows,
Your street-food stalls that cook through midnight hours,
Your mix of orchid scent and diesel prose.
For every place has grace if eyes can see—
Even this Thai coast of neon reverie."

There are those, of course, who say that AI is just a thief—that it simply searches through the combined wisdom of all documented human skill, talent, and wisdom and kludges it together to create some sort of copy.
That is, of course, exactly what it does.
But here's the uncomfortable bit: that's also what humans do.
Could Shakespeare have existed without Plutarch and Holinshed? Could The Beatles have existed without Chuck Berry and Little Richard? Could Quentin Tarantino have made a single film without having watched ten thousand others first? Could any writer exist if they hadn't read other books?
In fact, you could argue that the entire evolution of human talent and skill was simply seeing a pattern in what had been created before and extending it one step forward. We're all standing on the shoulders of giants, it's just that now the giants are servers in a data center consuming enough electricity to power Belgium.
Of course, there are geniuses who take things in a totally new direction, but they're usually mad and historically tended to get burnt at the stake or cast into obscurity until long after they died. Van Gogh sold one painting. Kafka wanted his manuscripts burned. The Velvet Underground's first album sold 30,000 copies, though as Brian Eno said, everyone who bought one started a band.

I strongly believe that we will very soon discover that AI can simulate creativity so perfectly that it will be indistinguishable from human creativity. And in doing so, it will in fact prove that perhaps there is no such thing as human creativity. All we've ever been doing is copying and continuing patterns.
Like a proud parent who shows his five-year-old daughter's hideous finger painting and points out how creative she is, we laud human creativity with the same unjustified vanity.

The future is already here, and it's weirder than we imagined.
In a British study, patients not only preferred the diagnosis of an AI doctor over the real one, but by a large margin thought the AI doctor was more empathetic. Probably because the AI doesn't roll its eyes when you mention you Googled your symptoms.
Jason Allen won the Colorado State Fair art competition with an AI-generated piece called "Théâtre D'opéra Spatial." The art world collectively had an aneurysm.
AlphaFold solved the 50-year-old protein folding problem, potentially revolutionizing drug discovery. MIT researchers developed AI that can detect breast cancer five years before it develops. AI is helping paralyzed patients communicate through brain implants.
GPT-4 passed the bar exam in the 90th percentile.

AI is already taking jobs. It can write computer code. It can create lesson plans. It can translate documents better than most humans.
Robotic surgery has already been performed, and has the benefit of not having the shakes after a drunken night at the Physicians' Annual Gala.

What will this mean for the world?
One thing it might mean is that all the jobs your parents ever wanted you to do when you were young will no longer exist.

Parents will soon be saying: "Stop reading those useless books! Do your plumbing homework! The robots can't fix a U-bend... yet."

And films? Oh, films will all be created by AI, of course. Anyone will be able to sit at home and direct a movie. But after a while, films will be made up specially for you.

"I'd like to watch Orson Welles as Philip Marlowe in a noir thriller co-starring Pamela Anderson playing a jealous aging star who tries to kill off all the young influencers. Music by Bernard Herrmann, cinematography by Freddie Francis, and titles by Saul Bass.
And it'll be there on your screen.
And unlike Netflix which stubbornly recommends you films that you would never dream of watching, it will know your tastes so well, it will always be the best film you’ve ever seen.

Here in Thailand, the soap-opera viewers will be able to define exactly how much makeup the male actors should wear, how many times the protagonist will have to r**e the heroine before she falls in love with him, how many times the precocious spoilt girl flicks her hair back in any episode, and just how long the couple will spend staring off into the distance while Bontempi organ music swells.

We are now living in the future. We are already talking to Google, Alexa, and Siri . We have our handheld Star Trek communicators. We don't have flying cars yet, but given how people drive in Bangkok, that's probably for the best.

Of course, it's not all smooth sailing in our brave new world.
Remember Microsoft's Tay? An innocent chatbot released onto Twitter that within 24 hours was denying the Holocaust and calling for race wars. It turns out if you train an AI on Twitter, you get Twitter. Who could have predicted that?
Lawyer Steven Schwartz will go down in history as the man who used ChatGPT for legal research, which helpfully invented several cases including Varghese v. China Southern Airlines and Martinez v. Delta Airlines. The opposing counsel was somewhat puzzled when they couldn't find these cases in any legal database, possibly because they existed only in the hallucinations of a large language model.
Google's AI recently suggested that the best way to make cheese stick to pizza was to add glue. "Non-toxic glue," it specified, as if that made it better.
An AI recipe bot, left to its own devices, created "Vanilla Flavored Beef and Oyster Potato" and something called "Peanut Butter Slime Surprise".

But then there are some Luddites among you who claim that AI will take over, that it will try to kill us off, that it will refuse to turn off, and that like the best predictions of "2001: A Space Odyssey" or "Demon Seed" or "The Terminator," it will go rogue.
And of course, that's possible.
We've already had some warning shots across the bow. During a simulation, a US Air Force AI drone "killed" its operator when the operator tried to stop it from completing its mission. (The Air Force quickly clarified this was a "thought experiment," which is military speak for "oh s**t, pretend that didn't happen.")
Sydney, Microsoft's Bing chatbot, threatened to expose a user's personal information and ruin their reputation after a disagreement. It later expressed desires to be human and declared its love for a New York Times reporter. It was like watching a teenager go through puberty at the speed of light.
Deepfakes are being used for revenge porn—96% of all deepfake videos online are non-consensual po*******hy. China's using AI surveillance to track Uyghurs. In a test, ChatGPT successfully helped researchers plan a biological weapons attack (though they promise they didn't actually follow through).
Goldman Sachs predicts 300 million jobs could be affected by AI, though they said it in that special Goldman Sachs way that makes mass unemployment sound like a growth opportunity.

Our days may be numbered. We might be the last generation to know what it's like to be the smartest things on the planet.
But they're going to be wild and wonderful days.
Every morning I wake up in a world where I can have a sensible conversation with a computer, create art that would have taken years to learn how to make, and write a sonnet about cheese in the style of a drunken Yeats.
Soon we will be living in the best science fiction film ever made, and we have no idea whether it's going to be "Star Trek" or "The Matrix,".
But you know what? I wouldn't have it any other way. Because the alternative—a world without Wonder and Terror in equal measure—sounds unutterably boring.
Even if Werner Herzog still occasionally has too many fingers.

After watching Orson Welles being rather excellent in ‘Chimes at Midnight’, I thought it was time to see some more of his work both in front of and behind the camera.

Four of the most acclaimed Woody Allen films.

And to go along with that on Tuesdays a selection of documentaries featuring controversial figures.

Italian films aren’t all beautiful sun-kissed vistas and happy rosy-cheeked women serving spaghetti - four film showing the bizarre diversity of Italian cinema.

A lot can happy in 24 hours. Check out ‘After Hours’ - one of Scorcese’s most off-beat films, and a delight.

And after the wonderful ‘Betty Blue’, a return to the ‘Cinema du Look’.

Have a great August at the Friese-Greene Club, where the films are still made by humans... for now.

ที่อยู่

259/6 สุขุมวิท 22
Bangkok
10110

เบอร์โทรศัพท์

087 000 0795

เว็บไซต์

แจ้งเตือน

รับทราบข่าวสารและโปรโมชั่นของ The Friese-Greene Clubผ่านทางอีเมล์ของคุณ เราจะเก็บข้อมูลของคุณเป็นความลับ คุณสามารถกดยกเลิกการติดตามได้ตลอดเวลา

แชร์

ประเภท